Remote Viewing RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion list archives. Dojo Psi dot com / info
Remote Viewing info page spacer

The RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion List Archives

Dojo Psi Library, Archival Material, Remote Viewing and Psi

RV Oasis / PJRV List Archives Menu

RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion, Yahoo Groups.
Source Location: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/
Filetype: Archive. Topic: Remote Viewing. Blocked: by topic detail.
Archive Storage: www.firedocs.com/pjrv/ and http://www.dojopsi.info/pjrv/
Archivist: Palyne PJ Gaenir (PJRV, Palyne, Firedocs RV, TKR and the Dojo Psi.)



begin archive


pjrv : Messages : 932-986 of 4038
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/932?)
22:39:30
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-PJRV_group---------

#932

From: "PJ Gaenir" Date: Sun Oct 27, 2002 12:05 pm Subject: Thoughts on Time dennanm Offline Offline Send Email Send Email The below is a slightly edited version of something I PEM'd to a friend recently and thought I would share with the list in case anybody else had thoughts on this issue. Like anything else I am just 'thinking out loud' - theorizing - not trying to come up with some grand answer for everybody, just trying to better understand myself and my RV process. ------------ I've really been thinking lately, working to better grok some things based on Joe's comments in the interviews and some conversations I've had with him. I think I hit on a fundamental crux of it recently, of where my thinking process is diverging that was leading me to a different end result... not understanding why concerning RV he didn't believe in infinite probabilities as an answer for example. So.... if I believe in probabilities IN A MANNER that requires I believe things could "shift" between now and the predicted future... ...then this would mean I had to believe in time. Linear time, no less. Like point A to point B(split) to point C1 and C2. But if there is no time, then every single point exists at the same space/time. So C1 is as separate from C2 as a crop circle target is from a bridge is from a person, as 2086 is from 1910 and 200 BC -- there are infinite Cs, and Ds, and infinite As and Bs for that matter, no closer or further apart, because all is one. So target overlay, sure it exists -- EVERYTHING exists -- but it exists infinitely, and it can be no 'closer or farther away' than anything else in the all-that-is if all is one. So if a viewer suffers overlay issues, it's because the viewer's beliefs, conscious or not, either in overlay itself or in the 'difficulty' of getting psi data or in their 'vulnerability' to others' thoughts or whatever, will *assign* any energy "from another viewer or tasker about the target" as PART OF what they consider valid data for the session. In short, it has nothing to do with 'overlay' and everything to do with viewer psychology. So, it is our intent that arbitrarily defines the 'identity' of what we target and separates out the target from the "infinite- everything- ness". So, the future event target is "what is true for me at the 'time' of that event because that is my feedback -- even if technically my body is no longer 'here' as I know it then, my consciousness always/everywhere exists." Or something. Hell. Actually I was doing fine with this theory during my lifespan based on feedback being the criteria, but floundered a little when considering predictions outside my lifespan or that had no feedback. :-) Technically, there may be infinite nows, we may be able to change our pasts, and there may be infinite futures, and we may have free will to change all of the above, to do the hokey pokey in and out of all kinds of realities in the now, on our way to the then. But it doesn't matter what is true 'now' or any other point in time or any other reality experience. It matters what is going to be true 'then' for 'me' at 'that' point in time -- that is the three point coordinate assigned an identity of 'target'. Feedback+Me+TemporalExperiencePoint=Target So it doesn't matter that this target is point C and there are infinite point C's -- or that I am B and there are infinite point B's -- we must BELIEVE there is only one point B and C, and that C is exactly what we are going to experience, and that is the target. If we believe anything else at all, we are "expanding the scope of inclusion of our intent-assignation of what constitutes the target" to include every other possible probability. Just like how some will expand it to include every other possible interpretation of a target (like other psychics, tasker, etc.). ARV displacement is expanding the scope of our intent to define the target to include, rather than exclude, the other probability(s). Because we mistakenly think that all events are equally probable and/or even that all will happen 'somewhere'. In fact, in order to consistently find the ONE answer that happens, we must believe there is ONE answer that happens, and only one that can (which is the one that does/will), in order to (a) find it and (b) isolate it from the everything-else. If the only thing that 'defines' what all is involved in a target is our own intent -- -- then the only thing relevant is our intent -- our beliefs. It is only "us". Which makes anything no closer or farther away, no more or less difficult, than the target of a building down the street, a soldier in 1812, or the team that wins the pennant in 2004. If all is one, and we're part of the one, and the only thing defining ANY target is our intent, then the only issue that is EVER an issue -- other than the obvious interference of frontloading or feedback stuff (which impinge on the real issue) -- is viewer psychology. So it's almost an advanced use of 'suspension of disbelief' where one is instead specifically setting one's own belief systems to be what they need for life, or anything in their life like RV: Our belief systems are our bridges, our castles and our moats, our motorcars and airplanes and spaceships, and we can creatively build them to be whatever we need to be. The 3-room hut that religion gives us, the 1300sq' tract home that our culture gives us, and the infinite-sky-castle that our metaphysics give us, none are exactly appropriate for RV, though some are worse than others. If you close potentials down you're doomed in RV like maybe you can't view at all; but if you open them up too far, you're equally doomed, where you can't view accurately or consistently. The only way to reliably know that there exists one answer to get clearly via RV, is to firmly believe there is one clear answer and we have direct access to it and the ultimate "permission" -- it is part of us, hence AS us, is both accessible and permissable. It occurs to me, pondering this, that in fact, NOT deliberately designing one's belief systems to suit RV if one is going to do it a lot, could be psychologically devastating. The uncertainty principle alone could totally whack one into a wide array of cognitive dissonance problems. But, like my exploring the "Aspect RV" concepts, I've never heard anybody talk about *specifically and deliberately designing your own belief systems to suit RV's needs* although now that I think about it -- similar to Aspect RV -- indirectly, I could read this from nearly anything Joe has ever said. And then for awhile, thinking about all of the above, I thought to myself, "Yes, but the probability schema I had earlier COULD be true." Then I realized that technically, *everything is true* because everything exists, in the now. Consensus reality is composed of people both psychically and physically agreeing upon what they are going to call true. The world is like a psychic chaperone for children to learn what is allowed to be 'true' and what is 'not'. But that 'truth' is as arbitrary a definition as what 'identity' one is going to assign as a target. So... it all comes back to Binah. In the QBL (Kabbalah). Polarities. Everything exists yet nothing exists, everything is true yet nothing is true, everything equally means its opposite. Everything is what we assign it to be, because 'thing-ness' equally doesn't as does exist, and our perception of thing-ness relies as much upon our perception as it does any quality in the thing. That's why the world reflects us. Why we create reality literally. The thing hanging on my wall is its own energy, I am my own perceiving-machine, and what I see as the framed print is really the combination of me+it=reality. They cannot be separated. When I removed the "me" from the equation, what I get is "it=everything else in existence which equally exists but which the 'me' does not perceive". Experiences I had during my Bewilderness days told me all this but I didn't properly absorb it until just now I think. So when I change the me, I get newMe+it=differentReality. Seriously, as stupid as it sounds, maybe even objects can be differently perceived -- or not perceived at all -- or both we and the object have a need to change its physical relationship to us -- just based on changes in the Me. Maybe some statues or all trees really ARE alive as identities like the egyptians and other ancient cultures thought, not just "in some other dimension", but even here, depending on the person perceiving. So a remote viewer could almost think of themselves like a universal plug set. Like how these little cases have "port attachments" where the "interface" is modified to fit, accept, and even translate, the energy coming in from a wall socket in Germany, Japan, England, or the US. I used this allegory years ago when thinking about myself, and my communicating with most any kind of person at their level, in a way they could relate to, sliding into different 'aspects of self' to better to/from handle their "input", as well as to better learn and do certain kinds of work or tasks -- a CEO once told me he knew very few people like me who could slide easily from warehousing to operations to accounting to sales to administration to database programming to investor relations and back again without blinking and do well in all -- different aspects of me did different kinds of work. Hilariously, I actually think these "aspects" are what Dr. Charles Tart calls "state-specific" in some of his research papers. If they are not invoked, I honestly do not know all the stuff they know, don't remember it, don't have the personality for it. But invoke them, and all the learning and experience I had when they were dominant comes back to the fore. I have really noticed that my moving out of the kind of management work that required extreme variety of work and communication, and doing the mommy and programmer routine, has vastly changed my personality manifested. I think all this might also apply to psychic work. PJ Reply | Forward

#953

From: Bill Pendragon Date: Sun Oct 27, 2002 7:35 pm Subject: Re: Thoughts on Time docsavagebill Offline Offline Send Email Send Email Invite to Yahoo! 360 Invite to Yahoo! 360 Hi PJ, I was also wondering whwether Joes flat statement that ARV was easy despite otheres experiences, might derive from his unusual belief that time doesn't exist. Or at least no more difficult than other RV. Hugs, Bill ---------------------- Moderator's note: Hi Bill. I think much to do with Joe's RV derives from his 'unusual' beliefs about time and space and so forth. I think a good deal of his beliefs about time/space resulted from (a) immense RV experience and (b) then deliberate focus upon belief systems and 'concept frameworks' that worked best for him in that regard. I think over time he custom-designed himself. Since 'he' is the primary element in his RV. -- PJ Reply | Forward

#986

From: Weatherly-Hawaii...m Date: Thu Oct 31, 2002 2:21 am Subject: Re: Thoughts on Time maliolana Offline Offline Send Email Send Email Invite to Yahoo! 360 Invite to Yahoo! 360 Aloha PJ, I have many excuses for not writing more about my sessions...(mainly I haven't been doing much lately)...I go through many cycles myself...some are emotional...some are physical...some are financial and all lead to anxiety... which is not always good for RV... Another excuse I have... is that I would be writing constantly to you ...saying things like...Yeah...that's exactly what I feel ...or happened to me ...or I thought I was the only one like that...and then I would seem like somone else we all know...Like I was just kissing up or something...Pretending... Not that I consider myself your equal in Rv intelligence/education or anything...but experientially I have had some very similiar self aware-nesses...almost uncanny...and have very similiar thoughts as many of those you write about...I read them all and then spend time thinking about it...You are so damn bright...I have to run to keep up!... And as you know...I have a vivid imagination and love to use my mind...in as many ways as possible... I am much more empathic and psychic than my rv sessions prove...except for negative psi high...hahah...My intuitions/psi... comes to me out of the blue and many times...I just know things...I have no idea how or why...but I do...things that are going to happen...but I rarely give predictions... because I fear looking like I think I am all that (and a bag of chips)...and being wrong... hahah...My intuition is not as trustworthy when judging...I have to switch to analytical/intellectual Dawna...I really get screwed up when I 'feel' so right about a target...I just know it is the correct one...and it isn't!...Man I hate that!...yet in regular life...this feeling of being 'on target' /knowing a reality... is most frequently correct... Sharing my session work is not a problem...My ego has grown enough to be willing to expose myself...I just need to do more of it...I can barely keep up with all the reading and my 'now' site Freevent...and my troubles with my last baby...and his refusing to grow up! I am keeping track of my biorythms and it does correspond with my low ebbs and flows...In physical/intuitional/emotional/intellectual...I 'believe' that I view best when my intuitional/intellectual are high...and not so well when they are low...I am still checking this out...No data per se...but the feeling came to me ...that I needed to watch this process...and that is why I got the cycle clock to go with sidereal time (when I can get with it at sidereal time!) I am doing a few sessions again...so I will try to remember to write about some of them...but they are real boring compared to so many others... especially yours... I don't take notes ...at least not that I keep or keep a record...I do PIA (ARV) and gotpsi and they keep my data for me...I know I need to get more serious in my record keeping...I do almost all of my writing/typing on the internet... hahah I would love it if we could all do an outbounder together...once a month or so... One thing that is so wonderful about ARV is one gets a chance to analyze/ judge ones own work...it is not always a good thing...especially when the intellectual cycles are low...but one learns...I hope... Love & Light & Laughter Mali'o...aka...Dawna

// end archive

Top of Page

Remote Viewing info page spacer

RV Oasis / PJRV List Archives Menu

Dojo Psi Library, Archival Material, Remote Viewing and Psi

The RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion List Archives


Remote Viewing RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion list archives. Dojo Psi dot com / info