Remote Viewing RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion list archives. Dojo Psi dot com / info
Remote Viewing info page spacer

The RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion List Archives

Dojo Psi Library, Archival Material, Remote Viewing and Psi

RV Oasis / PJRV List Archives Menu

RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion, Yahoo Groups.
Source Location: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/
Filetype: Archive. Topic: Remote Viewing. Blocked: by topic detail.
Archive Storage: www.firedocs.com/pjrv/ and http://www.dojopsi.info/pjrv/
Archivist: Palyne PJ Gaenir (PJRV, Palyne, Firedocs RV, TKR and the Dojo Psi.)



begin archive


pjrv : Messages : 182-182 of 4038
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/182?)
21:08:22
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-PJRV_group---------

#182

From: jsentient... Date: Sat Jul 20, 2002 3:37 pm Subject: Re: Target Strength jsentient Offline Offline Send Email Send Email Invite to Yahoo! 360 Invite to Yahoo! 360 Palyne, your thought that social consciousness exposure or involvement (with the target) could be RV inductive is one that I also considered. It's a good question,,,,,,,no, it's a great question. It needs experimental testing. My own limited RV experience tells me that social consciousness exposure is irrelevent,,,,not significant. NTL, I am convinced that the social factor is part of what's going on,,,,,the phenomenon seems to implicate connectivity. This is not to say IMO there is such a thing as "the collective unconsciouse", or that everything is consciouse (to include inanimate objects). Consider the possibility of projected or assigned perspective or even bi-location. Perception in such cases would be self grounded / generated, but would seem to indicate another source. I suspect what ever I can imagine, can be real. But the social factor is not irrelevant. It may be that it is consensus that establishes sanity. Well, when it comes to PSI, the question what's real is fundemental and problematic. Even more interesting however is the question of meaning. Meaning is abstact,,,,it is most definately the product of minds. I know it is possible to percieve meaning associated with a RV target. And when this is accomplished we have gone beyond description, beyond "sensing". Jay pjrv : Messages : 176-185 of 4038
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pjrv/messages/176?)
21:08:39
~~--------ArchivedPostFollows_Yahoo-PJRV_group---------

#176

From: "Palyne Gaenir" Date: Sat Jul 20, 2002 1:49 pm Subject: Target Strength dennanm Offline Offline Send Email Send Email I've been told that some targets simply only have so much data to acquire psychically. That for example, if the target is just an empty field, that there might be less chance of this having enough 'strength' to impinge on someone as "I'm viewing an empty field", than for example, another might impinge on someone "I'm viewing a playground". Targets with repeating patterns somehow seem to have a little more 'strength' on that. As if repeating data somehow provides more signal strength or something. Why is that? Some metaphysical exponential effect of likeness of intent - can intent be in allegedly inanimate object/environments? Could a big field have 'less data to acquire' than a big something-else? Could human intent matter? Would an orchard have more psychic data than a field because it was planted? Or would it be the 'patterns' that would make it stronger? Or is all such theory bogus? Many years ago I theorized two things, that (a) what you touch, touches you back, that RV is never one-way; and (b) that perhaps human consciousness vested in a given target could affect the strength at which it affected viewers. For example, (b) would suggest that maybe the great pyramid and eiffel tower might be strong targets because millions (if not billions) of people have gazed on them and focused on them and photographed them -- than perhaps the same general shape or size standing in a field in a kansas, or somewhat unknown in the midst of a mountain range. Looking back over sessions, what do you guys think? PJ Reply | Forward

#185

From: "scottrver" Date: Sat Jul 20, 2002 10:59 pm Subject: Re: Target Strength scottrver Offline Offline Send Email Send Email Invite to Yahoo! 360 Invite to Yahoo! 360 Hi PJ, You can find the article on Shannon entropy, which is related to this topic, at James Spottiswoode's site. (b) that perhaps human consciousness > vested in a given target could affect the strength at which it affected viewers. > > For example, (b) would suggest that maybe the great pyramid and eiffel tower > might be strong targets because millions (if not billions) of people have gazed > on them and focused on them and photographed them -- than perhaps the > same general shape or size standing in a field in a kansas, or somewhat > unknown in the midst of a mountain range. Of course Ingo RVed features of other planets never before seen by man. Scott ------------------------ Moderator's note: Hi Scott. Appreciate the ref, but Shannon Entropy in the RV context does not relate to the human consciousness invested in a target in any way. It relates basically to the rate of change within a target. (I only know this because I have hashed through it with Dr. May who wrote the paper.) Ingo's Jupiter stuff is great. I didn't mean to suggest (if that's what prompted the 2nd ref) that anybody had to witness something for it to be RVd (that's the telepathy assumption which has been proven wrong). I just meant that I wonder if some targets, somehow, "have more data to obtain", or certain elements have some... stronger energy... somehow. I don't know what I'm saying in detail as it's a question, not an answer. :-) -- PJ

// end archive

Top of Page

Remote Viewing info page spacer

RV Oasis / PJRV List Archives Menu

Dojo Psi Library, Archival Material, Remote Viewing and Psi

The RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion List Archives


Remote Viewing RV Oasis / PJRV Discussion list archives. Dojo Psi dot com / info